Cricks view of politics Essay

This probe will explain cricks views on government activity, as outlined in his book In defence of government activity (1962). That politics is a modal value to bring together differing opinions to resolves problems and disputes in a peaceful manner for the benefit of the mass and for the earnest of the populace. Cricks belief of what politics entails involves a democratic ideology and as we are considered to have a democratic society in which we live validating with quotes from cricks book.Also Crick highlights the importance of the difference of opinion people have, and much(prenominal)(prenominal) opinions macrocosm recognised, and being able to have freedom of speech, being unrestricted in the way that other countries are bound by dictatorship. Crick acknowledges that politics is never a straightforward art, in Cricks words, he describes politics as a messy business, being unpredictable, for example international and domestic events. This essay will use coeval example s to show how this so.In the 2010 election, there wasnt any party that had an overall majority (no party had more than half of members of parliament in the House of Commons), which meant that the Conservatives would be unable to have the majority of votes, to pass laws etc, without the support of other parties. In this case, the support came in the ferment of a formal coalition, with the Liberal Democrats. This being the first time Britain has had a coalition government in seventy years.This situation could said to be in accordance with what Crick asserted, that politics, ideally draws all these groups into each other, so that each individually, and together, can make a positive contribution towards the business of government, the maintaining of order (Crick 1962 18). Crick (1962 16) stated that for some politics is muddled, contradictory, self-defeatingly recurant, unprogressive, unpatriotic, inneficiant mere compromise, or even a sham or conspiracy .In contemporary society, many would argue that this is the case, and the reason why we are seeing parties such as UKIP becoming more populer. Politics can also be on a micro level,involving issues on a smaller scale, such as in the family home, for example, refering to Crick Jones states that People or groups of people who pauperization different things-be it causation, money, liberty, ect-face the potential or reality of conflict when such things are in short supply.For instance, a situation may germinate where a husband being given an employment opportunity,involving relocation to some other city,compromise would have had to play a big part,for financial gain for the great good of the family,as the earning potential of the husband is greater than that of the wife. In this situation issues of power also being present, the husband having the advantage,having the dominant position,simple due to earning more money. In conclusion, although Crick wrote his book in 1962, his ideas regarding politics , and the p ositive role, he believes it plays,is whitewash applicable in contemporay society to twenty-four hours.In the case of the present day coalition ,political parties of differing ideologies,have had to join together for the smooth running of the country, for greater good of the people. However, Crick also recognised that politics is still very much a messy, complicated process,and not everyone would feel that politicians were working in their stovepipe interests. Also that compromise plays a vital part on some(prenominal) a micro and macro level to reduce conflict.