Superpower Has No Moral Duty to Intervene in Foreign Tyrannies

Lord Acton said Power corrupts absolutely & absolute power corrupts absolutely. And it is no wonder that super power corrupts superbly. good panel of the jury, respected teachers & all(prenominal) my dear friends, and of course not to lead my worthy but disillusi integrityd opponents, a precise warm near afternoon to one & all. Nowadays the burning topic is whether power mess want in foreign affairs. Today I master aglitter(predicate) James George would like to speak against the motion business leader has a moral employment to interact in foreign tyrannies.In this contemporary world, superpower has a habit which they call as a moral handling. But I refer this as poking their nose in others matter. Since when the superpowers rose into this world, they found this intervention expedient for them on the other hand harmful for others. I hope my opponents receive that every members of unify Nations has to abide to its policy. In December 1965, UN General concourse had de cl atomic number 18d a policy stating that no country has to intervene in whatsoever affairs of other countries.My opponents cannot turn a blind midsection to these events US-Vietnam war, Russia Chechnya Conflict. Is this what my opponents call these superpowers moral duty by violating the UN policies? You got to think twice, my friends. I analyse to understand why my opponents believe in the so called moral duty of superpower intervention. Do superpowers know other countrys background, culture, usage etc.? They know only a myopic and remember little knowledge is always dangerous. With a little knowledge how can they intervene in foreign tyrannies?It doesnt sound good too either. When a country allows superpower to intervene in their tyrannies, it shows the incapability of the government to take care that country. Moreover all the success of that country becomes the glory of the superpower. What a compassion then A country must stand on its sustain foot. It can only seek help in a very critical situation. My opponents should not forget that in this politically cut-throat competitive world, one never intervenes unless & until if he or she gets a profit out of it. Superpowers do the same.They only intervene in matters for amassing wealth & especially to quench the proclivity of black water, that is, petroleum. It is no doubt that the motive of the Iraq war was to protect US economic interests- American access to gulf oil. Countries like the U. S. have apply its position as superpower says the global political scholar Francis Fukuyama claims 20 years since the fall of the Berlin Wall and the accepted end of the Cold War, the United States has misused its position as a superpower. When President Bush direct US military man to Somalia in 1992, he cited a humanitarian motive to feed the starving Somali Population.But paradoxically civil sound out has broken down, and starvation was usedas a weapon against innocent people. The American troops were enga ged in a manhunt for warlord Aideed. This led to ferocious fire controvert on October 3, 1993 the search was in futile. Nothing substantial was accomplished. Only bereavement & sorrow. Percy Bysshe Shelly in his Queen Mab says, Power, like a desolating pestilence, Pollutes whateer it touches and obedience, Bane of all genius, virtue, freedom, truth, Makes slaves of men, and of the human frame A mechanized automaton. According to me, Superpower, like a destructing nuisance, Pollutes whateer it intervenes. For instance, the former Yugoslavia, the Serbs, Bosnians etc. fought for nationalism. But as the superpowers like Russia intervened for altruistic reasons, things became worse. The final result was the disintegration of Yugoslavia. U. S & China doesnt convey India permanent membership in UN General Assembly. France accepted, UK accepted. Why not the Americans & the Chinese? Just a mere fear of India becoming superpower and superpower becoming soft power.Afraid of India becoming superpower, the present superpower regular army provides arms & ammunitions to Pakistan, so as to suppress India. However my obstinate opponents are still under the illusion of superpower intervention. Why superpower wants to involve in others matter, when they have problems like poverty, economic recession etc. in their country itself? To conclude, I would like to say superpowers should not mess about with some other countries till theirs is in order. Finally those who believe that Superpower has a moral duty to intervene in foreign tyrannies I believe they live in the fools paradise. Thank you