Leadership Study Essay

Question 1 What is your idea of Gerrys progression to evaluating the output of the red-hot- return development group? While Gerry seems ready for fresh and new product ideas, his near to evaluating ideas presented by mare and the new-product development group is rasping and in my opinion put forth as disapproval depravity constructive criticism. The team has been working hard and Gerrys comments, I take a crap the impression that there is a lot of activity going on here, only it does not seem to be focused activity, would possess me defensive and rather than listening to Gerry, Maria is probably thinking most how to respond to the snide comments and feedback. Gerry could have been to a greater extent tactful and should have been more supportive when turning down the teams ideas and putting Maria on the defensive. As a result, they are likely to interpret criticism as a personal attack on their self-worth.1 (DuBrin, 2013, p. 362) It would have been better in my opinion to s ay nothing or use tact in his approach and rather than criticize, he could have used it as a teach opportunity and turned down Marias idea with constructive feedback.Question 2 Do you think that Maria is getting excessively sensitive to criticism? Gerrys comments are not constructive but rather criticism so, no, I dont think Maria is getting too sensitive to Gerrys criticism. Garth Laidlaw pointed out that new-product development is a risky business and that 90 percent of new-product ideas never make it to the market place shelves so Gerry shouldve expected some failures. I think Gerry should have do it into the venture using what DuBrin calls a use loose-tight leadership style. Looseness refers to granting aloofness for new ideas and exploration, whereas a tight approach means finally fashioning a choice among the alternatives.2 (DuBrin, 2013, p. 365) Innovation is also enhanced when workers throughout the governance are able to purse absurd ideas without penalty for being improper or for having wasted some resources.3 (DuBrin, 2013, p. 365)Question 3 How do constraints on creativeness enter into this case? Gerry is not practicing transformational leadership and fostering an surroundings for change and insertion. The executive office sees a need for innovation, establishes a team and even places the team away from the corporate flag but I didnt see Gerry having a clear vision orproviding some(prenominal) type of guidance on the types of goods or sector that the new product development group should focusing their talents. Information about establishing a climate for creativity can be divided into (1) leadership and managerial practices for enhancing creativity and (2) methods for managing creative workers.4 (DuBrin, 2013, p. 357) Gerry wants innovation and creativity, provided resources but his rigid leadership style would freeze creativity in any organization. One should provide excellent tools and resources, bring in creative spate flexibilit y, turn down ideas gently, and employ creative people to manage and evaluate creative workers.5 (DuBrin, 2013, p. 366) The company seems focused on innovation for its own sake without a clear goal in mind, and Gerry is flying to criticize the ideas presented by the innovation team rather than recognizing opportunities in lemons. It takes a lot of lemons to make lemonade.